9/17/2023 0 Comments Devdocs wikipediaNote: I’m not suggesting that the effort isn’t worthwhile. What’s missing enough or making them unhappy enough to look around for a replacement that’s not just a different flavor from the Big Three? Enough that they’ll find and be interested in a (by comparison) small little open source tool? “Regular” people in those ecosystems are pretty happy with what they have. These ecosystems are promoted by major vendors that people have made big commitments to (Apple, Google). “The masses” or the “non-power users”, why are they leaving HomeKit? (Or Amazon, or Google.) Devices in these ecosystems are easy to find, ready-made products, and installing them into the associated controller is reasonably easy. I guess what I’m asking is, why would someone inexperienced with home automation choose Home Assistant in Simple Mode, instead of just sticking with HomeKit or Amazon Alexa or Google Home?īecause to me, it seems like maybe that’s not a large audience. Who is Simple Mode supposed to be for? Who’s the audience for Home Assistant in Simple Mode, who are the people it’s not able to reach without Simple Mode? Think of the accountant who is an advanced Excel user, but doesn’t have a clue about how to code a spreadsheet application in whatever language Excel is written in. But advanced mode still needs to be a GUI.Īn advanced user is NOT a developer. Hiding details in “advanced mode” is a great way to balance that. Of course, some things can’t be “dumbed down” enough for raw beginners. Things everyone would naturally want to do. They want (for example) what duesseldorferjung describes a GUI way to select days, day-of-week, etc. It’s absurd to think the masses are going to write code to do this. Having the GUI present a blank form field into which the user needs to write (or paste) code is a non-starter.Īutomations are the heart and soul of a home automation system. Having only some of the available options in the GUI, and requiring users to go edit a configuration file for others is a non-starter with all but us geeks. The purpose of this option inside the GUI is that a normal users can have the settings level set as “Standard” 99% of the time so that they don’t have to be exposed everyday to more advanced settings that not used most of the time, but they still always have the option via GUI to simply change the settings level to advanced or expert in order to expose and change settings classed as such if for example given advice in the cummunity forum to change an advanced setting for a specific thing and then be able to quickly change back the settings level in order to hide those more advanced settings again. More info on that user-experience in their wiki => Inside Kodi’s GUI, the “Settings level” can be changed using a button-icon in the bottom left on the GUI under the settings section, clicking that button in the GUI shows the currently selected setting level and allow the user to change setting levels on-the-fly, and it just as easy to change back. For this purpose Kodi has 4 tiered settings levels where each level unlocks more advanced settings those settings levels available in its GUI are: “Basic”, “Standard (Default)”, “Advanced”, and “Expert”. Should all users be able to switch on-the-fly between simple-mode and an advanced-mode to be able to be able to temporarly expose more advanced settings and functions in the UI only when needed?Įxample of software that does something similar is Kodi (formerly XBMC), it allows users to switch settings levels on-the-fly to hide or show more advanced options inside its GUI.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |